Shoe0nhead armored skeptic dating websites kerkdienst schildwolde online dating

I don’t necessarily have a problem with women voting or even having access to legal (relatively safe) abortions.What I have a problem with is the latent purpose behind the reasons that led to women’s decisions to vote a particular way or the latent purposes that brought them to having that abortion.For the greater part, any dubious ‘right’ women feel they were somehow denied in the past usually comes at the expense of men being liable for decisions they had nothing to do with.

shoe0nhead armored skeptic dating websites-51shoe0nhead armored skeptic dating websites-43

What I take issue with is the expectation of making men liable for the decisions and consequences of the rights and freedom of choices we’ve reserved for only women to make (almost unilaterally Hypergamic choices) that are not in men’s best interests.

I mentioned in that men today find themselves in a very precarious position with regard to entertaining women’s perceived wrongs of the past.

Men are expected,by default, to be held accountable, for no other reason than they were born men, for past injuries to the ever-changing Feminine Imperative.

Your existence as a man today, your failed understanding to accommodate women’s social primacy, your lack of catering to the ambiguous nature of what conveniently passes for masculinity, is a constant stinking affront and obstacle to the “advancement” of women.

‘ in some of the more socially acceptable tenets of feminism in some sort defense to the affront of my Red Pill lens being cast their way.

Last modified 15-Apr-2016 06:48